A Strong Voice for Croydon Central - Gavin Barwell MP
Help me
Contact me

Launching Migration Matters
13/02/2013 18:26:00


Last night, former Immigration Minister and Labour MP Barbara Roche, Liberal Democrat peer Lord Dholakia and I launched Migration Matters.

Immigration became an issue of increasing public concern during Labour’s period in office and in one sense it’s easy to understand why. Net immigration from outside the EU (that is the number of people coming into the country from outside the EU minus those leaving for non-EU countries) increased significantly. There was also significant migration from within the EU, particularly from eastern Europe following the last Government’s decision not to apply accession controls. And there was strong evidence that many people were coming here illegally and that people who were found to be here illegally were often not being removed.

The combination of these three effects has given rise to a number of concerns.

Some people are concerned about the overall numbers and their impact on public services and the demand for housing. The UK saw rapid population growth and because the impact of immigration was concentrated in certain parts of the country and there wasn’t sufficient investment in infrastructure in those areas it did undoubtedly lead to pressures.

Some are more concerned about who we let in and the economic impact on certain sections of society. There is some evidence that because a significant proportion of those who came here had relatively low skills they ended up competing with the unemployed for work and driving down wages at the bottom end of the labour market.

And some are concerned about the cultural impact of this change - rightly or wrongly, they feel that migration has changed their area in a way that they don’t feel comfortable with.

It is right that politicians address these concerns.

But another cause of the rising concern about immigration is the way the issue is discussed in our media. What’s my evidence for this? Well, there is very little correlation between the level of concern about immigration in different parts of the country and the actual levels of immigration in those areas, suggesting that people’s concern is driven not by what they see happening in their area but by what they believe is happening across the country as a whole based on what they hear or read in the media.

And in recent years much of that discussion has been based not on evidence but on a prejudice that all immigration is bad.

That needs correcting. And that’s why we’ve set up Migration Matters. Barbara, Navnit and I come from different political traditions. We’re not necessarily going to agree on the detail of policy. But we are united in wanting to see a nuanced debate that recognises the benefits of immigration as well as addressing the problems.

And if anyone reading this is in any doubt about what those benefits are, I would give three examples.

First, on a personal level many of my friends, neighbours, the activists who helped to get me elected, the people who deliver public services in Croydon, the people I meet when I visit charities and community organisations in the borough are first or second generation migrants. My life would be immeasurably poorer if they or their parents had never come here.

Second, at the moment the biggest challenge facing this country is to reduce the deficit and get the economy growing again at the same time. There is clear evidence that net migration boosts GDP (though not necessarily GDP/head) - indeed, the OBR forecasts on which the Chancellor relies are based on this assumption.

Third, the OBR has produced a fascinating report which shows how net migration can buy us more time to deal with the costs of an ageing society.

So yes let’s talk about immigration. Let’s address people’s concerns. But let’s do so based on the evidence, not a false assumption that all immigration is bad - an assumption which damages our prospects of winning the global race which the Prime Minister so rightly says we are involved in.

Comment on this blog


Readers' Comments

On 19/02/2013 23:48:00 peter king wrote:
So next year a few million people will be coming from Bulgaria and Romania to settle in England. Few of them will be software designers or engineers. Most will be competing for minimumn wage jobs and social housing. They will also send money back home, buy imported products in the UK. Seems a great profit and loss account for England. Doubt if this comment will appear.
On 20/02/2013 12:13:00 Gavin Barwell wrote:

It may surprise you to know that I share some of your concerns re unlimited migration from EU members that are significantly less prosperous than us.

Where you and I differ is that I despair of the way in which most people seem to see immigration as either a universally bad or universally good thing, rather than a more nuanced view that says the right types and level of immigration is good for the country but too much, the wrong type or none at all is bad.

On 28/02/2013 20:50:00 Paul Ogier wrote:
I am very pleased to see you now seeking a more nuanced debate on immigration, one which is not populist, including politicians, and media driven. This is very welcome. However I am perplexed about your response to an earlier blog response. Is your definition of a more nuanced response and debate to categorise it as " the right type --- good" and "the wrong type --- bad". It seems to me to echo a duality you often seem to use both in Parliament and on your blog e.g. taxpayers v benefit receivers; strivers, and though not explicit, shirkers. I don't think the our world or our society or this country can be reduced such simplistic categorisastions if we seek more nuanced debates - except probably in the debating chambers of Parliament or university and school debating societies.



 More Blog Posts
Thank you
  Read Story
My concession speech after the 2017 General Election
  Read Story
Today is polling day - and why I hope you'll support me at the polls
  Read Story
Five reasons to vote Conservative
  Read Story
Howler at the hustings
  Read Story
Campaigning suspended
  Read Story
Funding care for the elderly while making sure people who have worked hard can pass something on to their kids or grandchildren
  Read Story
Opposing Labour's plans for intensification zones in Shirley and Forestdale and to build on the Green Belt/Metropolitan Open Land
  Read Story
Labour’s misleading leaflet on school funding
  Read Story
Fox hunting
  Read Story

Full list of blog posts here

Gavin Barwell, 133 Wickham Road, CR0 8TE, Tel  020 8663 8741      © Gavin Barwell  2019       Promoted by Ian Parker on behalf of Gavin Barwell, both at 36 Brighton Road, Purley, CR8 2LG