A Strong Voice for Croydon Central - Gavin Barwell MP
Help me
About Me
Contact me

The Government is right to replace Educational Maintenance Allowance but I have concerns about the detail
20/01/2011 12:05:00

Yesterday, I spoke in a debate about the future of the Educational Maintenance Allowance (EMA). The Government is proposing to replace it with an enhanced Discretionary Learner Support Fund but the budget for this will be significantly less than the current budget for EMAs.

In many ways, EMAs are emblematic of Labour's approach to politics. The aim - to increase participation in post-16 education - is a good one and there is no doubt that each year EMA helps thousands of young people to stay on at school or college.

But like many of the former Government’s policies, it represents poor value for money for the taxpayer and it is a top-down solution that doesn't take account of individuals’ differing needs.

It is available to anyone aged 16-18 on a full-time further education course at a school or college (or on a course leading to an apprenticeship or a Foundation Learning Programme) from a family with a household income of less than £30,810 – in other words, it isn’t just targeted at the poorest families but goes to people from families with above average incomes. Two different reports found that only about 10% of the people who get EMA say that they wouldn’t stay on at school or college without it. There was some dispute about these figures during the debate but no-one denied that the scheme could be better targeted.

And everyone accepted that different young people have different needs. Some may have special needs or be caring for a parent or have to travel a long way to school or college. But EMA takes no account of these differences. You get £30 a week if your family income is less than £20,817, £20 a week if it is between £20,818 and £25,521 and £10 a week if it is between £25,522 and £30,810. Surely it would be better to let individual schools and colleges, who know the particular circumstances of their students, decide how much each student needs?

I do have a number of concerns however. First, is the funding that the Government has made available for the new Discretionary Learner Support Fund sufficient? Second, how will this funding be allocated to schools and colleges?

The Government has already done a lot to try to narrow the gap between the educational qualifications of those from well-off and deprived backgrounds – protecting the schools budget from cuts, introducing a pupil premium to provide extra funding for pupils from less well-off backgrounds, additional investment in early years education, additional apprenticeships and encouraging all pupils to take a core number of academic subjects at GCSE so that they have the necessary skills for today’s jobs market. Given the financial mess it has inherited from the previous Government, it can’t protect every area of spending. But the decision to replace EMA is a painful one that will affect many of my constituents and we need urgent answers to these questions.

Comment on this blog



 More Blog Posts
Reflections on yesterday's attack
  Read Story
IVF services in Croydon
  Read Story
Government backs upgrade of London to Brighton railway and refuses to fund BML2 concept that would be bad news for Addiscombe in particular
  Read Story
Spot the difference
  Read Story
Second interim report on Croydon tram crash
  Read Story
Fixing our broken housing market.
  Read Story
Government provides £14m for refurbishment of Fairfield Halls and redevelopment of College Green.
  Read Story
Southern Rail latest update
  Read Story
How I will vote on the EU (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill
  Read Story
Reaction to Donald Trump's Executive Order on entry to the US
  Read Story

Full list of blog posts here

Gavin Barwell, House of Commons, SW1A 1AA, Tel  020 8660 0491      © Gavin Barwell  2017       Promoted by Ian Parker on behalf of Gavin Barwell, both at 36 Brighton Road, Purley, CR8 2LG