A Strong Voice for Croydon Central - Gavin Barwell MP
Home
News
Help me
Campaigns
About Me
Expenses
Contact me

Two key tests for higher tuition fees
13/10/2010 09:04:00

Yesterday, Lord Browne published his review into higher education funding and student finance. I guess it made pretty grim reading for those hoping to go to university in the future and parents of young children like me, but given the financial mess we’ve inherited there’s not much alternative. We can’t significantly cut funding for our universities – they are absolute vital to the future prospects of UK plc – and the Government can’t afford to keep funding them at the current level so students are going to have to pay more.

The key tests are whether pupils from less well-off backgrounds would be put off from going to university and whether in return for paying more students would get a better experience than they currently do.

On the first test, Lord Browne argues that upfront tuition fees certainly deter people from less well-off backgrounds and recommends putting right the current unfairness where full-time students pay back their tuition fees once they are earning more than £15,000 but part-time students have to pay upfront. He also recommends raising the amount people have to earn before they start paying back to £21,000 but charging a real rate of interest of 2 per cent once they cross that threshold. The Government needs to look at other measures alongside these to ensure that bright students from all backgrounds continue to go to our best universities.

On the second test, the reforms should encourage new institutions to enter the market. Rather than offering their own degrees, they might teach you to sit for a degree from a more well known university (Croydon College, for example, already offers some degrees from the University of Sussex), allowing you to get the degree you want while saving money by studying from home. They might have longer terms so that you can complete a degree in two years, not three, and therefore graduate with less debt. And if we do get new institutions, it should make existing universities raise their game in terms of what they offer students. If we are going to ask young people to pay more on the grounds that they will earn more later in life, then they are entitled to expect more in return.

Comment on this blog

 

Readers' Comments

On 18/10/2010 15:42:00 Anthony Miller wrote:
What about a retrospective Grant Tax, whereby people like yourself who not only went to University in the era of no tuition fees, but were PAID to go there by the government actually cough something up instead of ever increasing tax burdens on the youngest generation of students? I suppose that would give the game away that the younger generation have to absorb a bigger tax burden to pay for all the oldies?
 
 

 

 

 More Blog Posts
23/03/2017
Reflections on yesterday's attack
  Read Story
15/03/2017
IVF services in Croydon
  Read Story
02/03/2017
Government backs upgrade of London to Brighton railway and refuses to fund BML2 concept that would be bad news for Addiscombe in particular
  Read Story
27/02/2017
Spot the difference
  Read Story
21/02/2017
Second interim report on Croydon tram crash
  Read Story
07/02/2017
Fixing our broken housing market.
  Read Story
02/02/2017
Government provides £14m for refurbishment of Fairfield Halls and redevelopment of College Green.
  Read Story
02/02/2017
Southern Rail latest update
  Read Story
31/01/2017
How I will vote on the EU (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill
  Read Story
30/01/2017
Reaction to Donald Trump's Executive Order on entry to the US
  Read Story

Full list of blog posts here

     
Gavin Barwell, House of Commons, SW1A 1AA, Tel  020 8660 0491      © Gavin Barwell  2017       Promoted by Ian Parker on behalf of Gavin Barwell, both at 36 Brighton Road, Purley, CR8 2LG